What psychological effects are there of
reading short stories and novels? By now there has been a substantial amount of
research to answer this question. The consensus seems to be that reading
fiction as an individual pursuit can enable people to improve their empathy and
to understand others better. The method known as meta-analysis involves
collecting a number of studies on an issue such as this, and statistically
estimating the size of effects. In this way "seems to be" can become
"is." In a study published earlier this year, Micah Mumper and
Richard Gerrig conducted a meta-analysis of studies of associations of lifetime
leisure reading with social cognitive measures. The main
measure of lifetime reading was the modification made by Mar et al. (2006) of
the Author Recognition Test, to distinguish reading of fiction from
non-fiction.
Analyses were performed for effects on empathy
with data from 22 studies. The most frequently used outcome measure was the
Interpersonal Reactivity Index of Davis (1983). Analyses were also performed on
data from ten studies for effects on theory-of-mind (understanding others). For
these, the most frequently used outcome measure was the Mind-in-the-Eyes test
of Baron-Cohen et al. (2001).
To estimate the size of this effect, the
Mumper and Gerrig aggregated results for empathy and theory of mind. The result
was that an association was found for reading of fiction with empathy and
theory of mind, which was small but significant. Reading non-fiction did not
have this effect. At least one other meta-analysis, as yet unpublished, has
been performed on experiments in which people were given different kinds of
material to read, and short-term and medium term effects were measured. It
comes to a similar conclusion.
Mumper and Gerrig say that although the
effect is small it is important because of "the potential interpersonal
and societal benefits of greater empathy and theory of mind" (p. 118).
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y.,
& Plumb, I. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test Revised
version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger's syndrome or
high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42,
241-251.
Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences
in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 44, 113-126.
Mumper, M. J., & Gerrig, R. J. (2017). Leisure
reading and social cognition: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics,
Creativity, and the Arts, 11, 109-120.
Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., dela Paz, J., &
Peterson, J. B. (2006). Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus
non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of
fictional social worlds. Journal of Research in Personality, 40,
694-712.
No comments:
Post a Comment